The
Freedom to Choose: Young Adult
Dystopian Fiction
by
Marjorie Warmkessel
In
the publishing world, "young adult"
refers to people between the ages of
12 and 18, in other words adolescents
or teenagers. "Dystopian," according
to the Oxford English Dictionary, is
an adjective meaning "of or pertaining
to a dystopia," which is "an imaginary
place or condition in which everything
is as bad as possible." The etymology
of the word is the Greek prefix "dys,"
meaning "bad" or "abnormal," and the
Greek word "topos," meaning "place."
"Dystopia" is closely related to the
word "utopia" (literally "not a
place," the Greek prefix "ou" meaning
"not"), which since the time of Sir
Thomas More's 1516 work of that name
has meant "a place where everything is
perfect." "Fiction," of course, refers
to works of literature (primarily
novels or short stories) that describe
imaginary events and people. So,
putting the definitions together,
"young adult dystopian fiction"
denotes novels that have been
primarily written for and marketed to
people between the ages of 12 and 18
and that describe really bad places or
conditions.
We haven't had the
category of "young adult fiction" or
even "young adults" forever. The idea
of young adults or teenagers as a
distinct social demographic goes back
only to about the 1940s, and the first
wave of books written specifically for
young adults, such as The
Outsiders and Are You There
God, It's Me Margaret, appeared
in the 1960s and 1970s. (1)
Among the key features of these books
are main characters who are themselves
young adults and descriptions of
situations that are similar to those
confronted by real life young adults,
including coping with coming of age
and dealing with contemporary social
issues. It was not until the late
1990s that young adult fiction was
aggressively marketed as such. In this
period, young adult books became best
sellers and big Hollywood movies.
Among the best-known young adult
titles of this period are the Harry
Potter books, the Twilight saga,
and The Hunger Games.
My title, "The Freedom to Choose," is
a fragment of a sentence from Lois
Lowry's The Giver, published
in 1993 and considered one of the
first young adult dystopian novels. In
2014, twenty years after the book's
publication, The Giver was made into a
movie starring Jeff Bridges in the
title role and Meryl Streep as the
head of the Council of Elders. Even if
you never read the book or saw the
film, you may remember the TV ads from
2014 that featured Ms. Streep saying
the complete line: "When we give
people the freedom to choose, they
choose wrong." And this is one of the
common themes of dystopian fiction: a
totalitarian government controls the
lives of its citizens. Individuals in
these fictional societies are not free
to choose.
The protagonist of
The Giver is 12-year-old Jonas,
a young adult who lives with his
parents and younger sister in a small
community where everything is
regulated, everyone has exactly what
they need, and surveillance is the
norm. There is no poverty, no crime,
no disease, no war. "Sameness" is
valued; individuality and diversity
are seen as threats. Residents
have no communal memory, no sense of
history beyond their own lifespan. A
major ritual in Jonas's society is the
Ceremony of Twelve, the time when all
12-year olds are given their training
assignments for jobs they will hold
for the rest of their lives. Jonas'
mother works at the Department of
Justice, responsible for enforcing the
community's many rules; his father is
a Nurturer of
Newchildren.
Jonas' assignment
comes as a complete surprise, not only
to him but also to most members of the
community: he is assigned to be the
Receiver of Memory, a highly respected
job but one that is seldom assigned,
no more than once every generation or
two. In this society, one person holds
all communal memories. With memories
come emotions, which are highly
discouraged and even chemically
controlled. Jonas begins to train with
the previous Receiver of Memory, an
old man he calls the Giver. He feels
pleasure and pain for the first time.
He also becomes aware of the flaws in
this supposedly perfect society. He
has grown up knowing that the elderly
are eventually "released," but through
his training with the Giver, he
realizes that "released" means
euthanized. He also becomes aware that
rule violators are killed. When his
father brings home a troublesome
newborn who does not conform to
behavioral expectations, Jonas
realizes that if the baby does not
eventually behave, he too will be
"released." With the Giver's help,
Jonas takes the baby and escapes the
confines of the only community he has
ever known.
Often in
dystopian fiction, the circumstances
that led to the creation of the
sociopolitical structure are gradually
revealed to the reader. Usually it is
something catastrophic, motivating
those who survive the disaster to
rebuild society while trying not to
repeat what they interpret as the
mistakes of the past. While Lowry does
not reveal what happened to cause the
creation of the world she describes,
it is clear that those in power are
motivated by good intentions even if
the reader, and eventually Jonas,
recognize that these intentions are
misguided. Sameness, control of
emotions, strict rules, and
surveillance are all intended to
protect citizens from each other and
from themselves. What results,
however, is a culture that does not
tolerate diversity, lacks creativity,
is satisfied with the status quo, and
accepts murder as something that
sustains the greater good. In such a
culture, citizens do not even
recognize that they have no freedom to
choose.
*
* *
In
other dystopian worlds, citizens are
well aware that they are not free.
They exist under totalitarian regimes
run by ruthless dictators whose sole
objectives are to stay in power. This
kind of dystopia is the world of The
Hunger Games. First published in
2008, The Hunger Games is the
first book of Suzanne Collins'
bestselling trilogy, all three books
of which became blockbuster Hollywood
movies. At the beginning of the novel,
16-year old Katniss Everdeen lives in
District 12, the poorest district in
the country of Panem. As a means of
keeping the populace under control,
the government carefully restricts its
citizens' access to food, requiring
each district to send food and other
natural resources to the Capitol.
Another way the government controls
its citizens is by holding the annual
Hunger Games, gladiator-style
televised spectacles where twenty-four
competitors, a boy and a girl from
each district, literally fight to the
death, using their wits and physical
prowess to be the last one left
alive—a barbaric practice made all the
more appalling because the
participants, called Tributes, are
people between the ages of 12 and
18. Katniss becomes the female
Tribute from District
12.
References to
tributes, gladiators and other aspects
of Roman history are not accidental.
The president is Coriolanus Snow, the
host of the televised games is Caesar
Flickerman, and the head game-maker is
Seneca Crane. Even the name of the
country, Panem, is Latin for bread and
brings to mind the phrase "panem et
circenses," "bread and circuses" or
"bread and games," used by the Roman
satirist Juvenal in his criticism of
the superficiality of imperial Roman
culture, when bread and games were
offered as diversions to distract
people from more serious social
concerns and
responsibilities.
Traveling to the
games with Katniss is Peeta, District
12's male tribute. Once they arrive,
Katniss and Peeta become keenly aware
of the conspicuous consumption of
residents of the Capitol. Here people
have so much food they throw it away;
they are obsessed with their physical
appearance and preoccupied with all
things trivial and superficial. The
citizens of the Capitol would fit
right in on Real Housewives of
Beverly Hills and offer a harsh
contrast to residents of the remote
districts, who are literally starving.
The
well-orchestrated pageantry of the
pre-game ceremonies, featuring
individual interviews with each
competitor, is televised live across
Panem and required watching for
everyone. The stability of the
government depends, in fact, upon its
skillful manipulation of communication
and public relations tools. Up to this
point, no one has been successful in
destabilizing the government. It is
our heroine Katniss who finds the
chink in the president's armor,
reluctantly becoming a symbol of
growing unrest across the country.
Challenging the very rules of the
Hunger Games, Katniss refuses to kill
Peeta when the two of them are the
last tributes alive. Much to the
chagrin of the government, they emerge
as co-victors, the first time that had
ever happened.
In Catching
Fire, the second book of the
trilogy, President Snow challenges
Katniss directly by changing the rules
for the Hunger Games so that only past
victors can compete. Katniss and Peeta
once again represent District 12 and
once again they both survive as
rebellions erupt across Panem. By the
end of the third book, Mockingjay,
Katniss has succeeded in spearheading
the overthrow of the repressive
government along with facilitating the
demise of President Snow and other
corrupt political leaders. She returns
to District 12, marries Peeta, and
lives happily ever after.
A surprisingly
domestic, fairy-tale-like ending,
given the plot's concerns with state
power and liberty, but remember that
the target audience for these books is
adolescents, people who, because of
hormonal changes, are particularly
interested in romantic relationships.
Their authors are usually willing to
cater to this kind of demand; Katniss
actually has more than one love
interest throughout the series. Older
readers may find it tempting to
envision the intelligent, resourceful,
independent Katniss playing a pivotal
role in the establishment of a new
government. Why would she not want to
provide visible leadership in creating
a free and open society where
resources are shared equitably and no
one goes hungry? However, for the late
Millennials who read The Hunger
Games as young adults when it
was first published and for those who
are now young adults (for whom we do
not yet have an agreed upon name), the
idea of Katniss as a government leader
is seen as unimportant, perhaps even
undesirable. After all, throughout her
life, she has not been able to trust
government leaders or, for that
matter, most adults. Maybe she's done
enough and deserves a quiet life of
anonymity.
*
* *
The Divergent
trilogy by Veronica Roth,
published between 2011 and 2013 and
set in post-apocalyptic Chicago,
describes a society divided into five
factions: Abnegation, Amity,
Candor, Dauntless, and Erudite.
Members of Abnegation are selfless,
valuing the needs of others above
their own. The ruling Council is made
up of 50 people, all members of the
Abnegation faction since they are
thought to be incorruptible. Members
of Amity value peace and harmony, are
willing to help others, and are able
to let go of past hurts. Members of
Candor value honesty, perceiving charm
and politeness as tools of deception.
Members of Dauntless are brave and
guard the fence around Chicago.
Members of Erudite value knowledge,
viewing ignorance as the primary
threat to society. Membership in a
faction is determined by giving all
16-year olds an aptitude test.
Regardless of the test results,
individuals can choose any of the
factions.
The heroine of Divergent
is 16-year old Tris Prior, a young
adult who is born into an Abnegation
family. Her aptitude test is
inconclusive as three possible
factions are suggested to her:
Abnegation, Dauntless, and Erudite.
That she has an aptitude for more than
one faction, by definition a
"divergent," is unusual and is
considered a threat to society since
"divergents" are capable of
independent thought. At the Choosing
ceremony, she chooses Dauntless,
something almost unheard of for
someone born and raised in Abnegation.
As the story
unfolds, it becomes apparent that the
leaders of Erudite are planning to use
members of Dauntless to infiltrate and
destroy Abnegation so that Erudite can
control the ruling Council. Tris and
some of her Dauntless cohorts are
central to discovering and thwarting
the plot, but not before many of their
friends and family members are killed
in fighting and acts of terrorism.
Ultimately, through the third book of
the trilogy, it is revealed that the
society of Divergent was
established as a result of genetic
engineering experiments gone horribly
wrong. Many years before, in an
attempt to eradicate social problems
thought to be caused by "bad genes,"
government scientists modified
people's genetic profiles. Those with
modified or damaged genes rose up
against the government; in the ensuing
uprisings half the population was
killed. In response, the government
once again turned to genetic
engineering to create people with pure
genetic profiles. These people became
known as "divergents."
This plot point
represents another common theme in
dystopian young adult fiction: that
previous generations, often with the
support of the government, have really
made a mess of things, either
intentionally or unintentionally, and
often through the misuse of
technology. Subsequent generations, in
trying to fix the problems, have
succeeded only in making matters
worse. As the plots of these novels
unfold, it is clear that the future of
civilization and maybe even the future
of the human race lie in the hands of
the young adult heroines and heroes of
our stories, along with their peers
and a small handful of trusted older
people.
This theme provides
a clue as to why dystopian fiction is
so popular with young adults—and that
is the question to which we now turn.
*
* *
Dystopian fiction may appeal to young
adults because they can identify with
the protagonists, who are themselves
young adults. While the fictional
characters may seem to live in a
universe totally different from our
reality, on many levels they are
coping with the same issues as real
teenagers. More than one scholar has
suggested that teenagers can easily
relate to a dystopian world because
they see their own world as a
dystopia. High school students enjoy
very little autonomy or independence;
parents, teachers, and other adults
are always telling them what to do and
what not to do; and they must navigate
through countless rules and
regulations, many of which seem petty
and arbitrary. All the while, adults
are assuring them that this is for
their own good.
When they are
expected to make decisions about their
future, they see every decision as
potentially life changing and fear
that the wrong decision could prove
catastrophic. As with the Ceremony of
Twelve in The Giver, the
reaping ceremony in The Hunger
Games, and the choosing ceremony
in Divergent, adolescents on
their way from childhood to adulthood
are expected to take an array of
high-stakes tests, to make some
important decisions (often for the
first time in their lives), and to
take responsibility for the
consequences of those decisions.
Adolescence is a
time when most people first begin to
grapple with abstract concepts and try
to think about the complex moral
issues playing out in the world around
them. Dystopian literature often
shares these themes. Additionally,
young adult readers observe that the
characters of these novels start out
as ordinary teenagers but, through
circumstances beyond their control,
are challenged to do difficult and
frightening things in order to protect
those they love, or to fight
injustice, or to save themselves. In
most cases they succeed, but their
successes always come at a price. The
Hunger Games and Divergent
trilogies are very violent. People
get killed. Good people get killed,
not just the bad guys.
So why are we
seeing such a profusion of young adult
dystopian novels now? One reason is
the current political climate. Earlier
dystopian novels reflected Cold War
sensibilities. More recent dystopian
novels reflect a post-9/11 culture.
Keep in mind that although today's
young adults are too young to have any
personal memories of September 11
(even if they were alive in 2001,
which many of them were not), they are
well aware of the events and attitudes
precipitated by 9/11.
As mentioned
earlier, a name for the generation
that comes after the Millennials has
not been agreed to yet. The generation
after the Baby Boomers is Generation
X. After Gen X come the Millennials or
Generation Y. So, logically, the next
group would be Generation Z, but who
would want to be a member of
Generation Z, presumably the last
generation? Even in dystopian novels
there's almost always a glimmer of
hope for a brighter future.
British economist
Noreena Hertz has coined the term
Generation K for those born between
1995 and 2002. She has begun doing
research on this group, specifically
young women. In 2015 she published the
results of a survey of more than a
thousand British and American girls
who were between the ages of 13 and
20. She found that their formative
years had been influenced by three
major factors: technology (especially
social networking technology to
connect with others), the major global
economic upheaval of 2008, and very
real geo-political dangers. Among
other things, she found that only four
percent of her respondents trust big
corporations (as opposed to 60% of
adults) and only 10% trust the
government (as opposed to 20% of
Millennials). And where does the term
Generation K come from? Professor
Hertz named them K for Katniss
Everdeen, heroine of The Hunger
Games.
Footnote
(1) Some novels
published before the naming of the
"young adult fiction" category, like Lord
of the Flies or A Separate
Peace, have since been so
categorized.
Works
Cited and Consulted
Ames, Melissa.
"Engaging 'Apolitical' Adolescents:
Analyzing the Popularity and Educational
Potential of Dystopian Literature
Post-9/11." The High School Journal 97.1
(Fall 2013), 3-20.
Brugar, Kristy A. "Empowering Students
through History: The Giver as a Metaphor
and Preparation for Studying History in
the Secondary Classroom." The
History Teacher 46.1 (2012),
85-94.
Hanson, Carter F. "The Utopian Function
of Memory in Lois Lowry's The Giver." Extrapolation
50.1 (2009), 45-60.
Hertz, Noreena. "Generation K: Who are
They, and What Do We Know about Them?" New
York Times, April 21, 2015.
Hubler, Angela. "Lois Lowry's and
Suzanne Collins' Dystopian Fiction:
Utopia and Anti-Utopia." Against the
Current, July/August 2014, 23-27.
Lucey, Thomas A. et al. "Dimensions of
Citizenship through the Lens of The
Hunger Games: Fiction and the Visual and
Performing Arts as Springboards for
Citizenship Education." The Social
Studies 104 (2013), 190-199.
Parks, Lori L. and Jennifer P.
Yamashiro. "Consumed: Food in The Hunger
Games." European Journal of American
Culture 34.2 (2015), 137-150.
Penny, Laurie. "No Wonder Teens Love
Stories about Dystopian Futures—They
Feel like They're Heading for One." New
Statesman, March 28-April 3, 2014,
19.
Reeve, Philip. "The Worst is Yet to
Come." School Library Journal,
August 2011, 35-36.
Scholes, Justin and Jon Ostenson.
"Understanding the Appeal of Dystopian
Young Adult Fiction." The ALAN
Review 40.2 (Winter 2013) 11-20.
Sturgis, Amy H. "Not Your Parents'
Dystopias." Reason 46.5 (October
2014), 46-51.
Author's
Biography
From 1978-2013 Marjorie Warmkessel was
a librarian at Millersville University
(PA), serving in many different
positions there both in and outside
the library.
She has a B.A. in
Classics from Goucher College, an M.S.
in Library Science from the University
of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and
an M.A. and Ph.D. in Comparative
Literature from Rutgers University.
Since her
retirement she has taken the
opportunity to travel. She enjoys
reading (especially fiction) and
movies and is a lifelong fan of the
Boston Red Sox.
She has been a
member of the Lancaster (PA) Torch
Club since 2013 and is currently the
club president.
Her paper was first
presented to the Lancaster club on
March 4, 2016.